Speed Up SharePoint

Can SharePoint Be Used as a Database? Pros, Limits & Best Practices

Learn when SharePoint lists work well, their limitations, performance considerations, and when Azure SQL is a better choice.

Contact Us

Enterprise teams typically see measurable performance gains within weeks. Schedule a technical review to identify architectural bottlenecks and next steps.

Schedule Technical Review

FAQ — Can SharePoint Be Used as a Database?

Short Answer

No. SharePoint should not be used as a database. It is a collaboration and document management platform — not a transactional or analytical data store.

You can store structured data in SharePoint Lists, but doing so at scale introduces performance, reliability, and architectural risks that grow over time.

Why This Question Comes Up

Many teams start using SharePoint Lists as a database because:

What works at 1,000 rows often collapses at 50,000+ rows.

What SharePoint Is Actually Designed For

SharePoint Excels At

  • Document storage and versioning
  • Collaboration workflows
  • Metadata tagging and search
  • Permissions and compliance
  • Content-centric experiences

SharePoint Does Not Excel At

  • High-volume structured data
  • Complex querying
  • Aggregations and reporting
  • Transactional integrity
  • Predictable performance at scale

The Recommended Architecture (Instead)

  1. Keep files in SharePoint (private, permissioned assets)
  2. Extract metadata and thumbnails into a real database
  3. Query the database for UI, APIs, and reporting
  4. Download files from SharePoint only when access-controlled
  5. Use Blob Storage or on-prem storage for high-throughput or public assets

SharePoint Lists vs SQL Databases

Capability SharePoint Lists SQL Database
Intended useCollaboration metadataStructured data storage
Row count tolerance~5,000–30,000 practicalMillions+
Query performanceDegrades quicklyPredictable & indexed
JoinsLimited / awkwardNative & efficient
AggregationsSlow / restrictedFast
TransactionsNoneACID-compliant
API reliabilityThrottledStable
Schema evolutionPainfulControlled
ReportingWeakStrong

Key Technical Limits of SharePoint Lists

  1. List View Threshold — 5,000 items per view is a hard boundary
  2. API Throttling — background jobs fail unpredictably
  3. No True Relationships — lookups are not joins
  4. Poor Query Patterns — no grouping, windowing, or complex sorting

When SharePoint Lists Are Acceptable

When You Should Use SQL

Performance Comparison: SharePoint vs SQL

Real-world, order-of-magnitude metrics for filtering, sorting, and searching multiple columns at scale. SharePoint Lists degrade quickly as row counts increase, while SQL databases remain predictable and indexed.

Operation / Scenario SharePoint List SQL Database
Filter 1 indexed column (1k rows)~100–300 ms~5–15 ms
Filter 3 columns (5k rows)~300–800 ms~10–25 ms
Filter 5 columns (10k rows)1–3 seconds~15–40 ms
Filter + sort (20k rows)3–8 seconds~20–60 ms
Text search (non-indexed)Often unusable~30–80 ms
Aggregation (COUNT, GROUP BY)Not viable~20–100 ms
Concurrent users (50+)Throttling likelyNormal

Final Answer

SharePoint is not a database. It should not be treated like one. The correct architecture is hybrid, not all-in-SharePoint.

“SharePoint stores files well. Databases store data well. Mixing the two creates long-term risk.”

Contact Us

Call or email today for a technical consultation. Enterprise bottlenecks won’t fix themselves.

Speed Up SharePoint

(818) 209-1548

[email protected]